Invergent's decision model for text and images. A fine-tune of Gemma-4-26B-A4B (about 4B parameters active per token) that answers Choice, Noul and Score questions, with an optional thinking mode for harder questions.
Upstage's structured decision model, a System One endpoint on Solar Mini 4. Returns a choice, a score or a yes/no answer with a probability read from the model, in one forward pass, on the same /v1/systemone schema as Jev.
Decides
choice, score, noul, classify, route
choice, score, noul, classify, route
Architecture
rune
solar
Fine-tuned from
google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it
—
License
apache-2.0
proprietary
Availability
Open weights + hosted API
Hosted API
Hosted by
Invergent
Upstage
Input price
—
$0.10/MTok
Decision accuracy
—
—
Calibration error
—
—
Valid action rate
—
—
Median latency
—
—
p95 latency
—
—
Figures are from each model’s manifest; accuracy and latency are what the publishers report, on their own suites and hardware. Add a third model.
Questions
What is the difference between rune and solar-decide?
rune is from Surogate (Invergent) and solar-decide from Upstage. rune has open weights and a hosted API; solar-decide is only available as a hosted API. Both answer choice, score, noul, classify and route questions. solar-decide reads up to 512K tokens of state, against 262K tokens for rune. rune is licensed apache-2.0; solar-decide, proprietary.
Which is more accurate, rune or solar-decide?
Neither publishes an accuracy figure. Test both on your own labelled examples.
Which is cheaper, rune or solar-decide?
rune: Hosted, price not published, or free to self-host. solar-decide: $0.1 / $0 per 1M. Open weights cost nothing per call beyond your own hardware.
Can I run rune or solar-decide locally?
rune yes — systemone pull surogate/rune downloads its weights. The other is only served as a hosted API.
