Small open typed-decision model with calibrated probabilities, first-class Nepali coverage.
Upstage's structured decision model, a System One endpoint on Solar Mini 4. Returns a choice, a score or a yes/no answer with a probability read from the model, in one forward pass, on the same /v1/systemone schema as Jev.
Decides
choice, score, noul, classify, route
choice, score, noul, classify, route
Architecture
mira
solar
Fine-tuned from
jhu-clsp/mmbert-small
—
License
apache-2.0
proprietary
Availability
Open weights
Hosted API
Hosted by
—
Upstage
Input price
—
$0.10/MTok
Decision accuracy
74.5%
—
Calibration error
0.025
—
Valid action rate
100.0%
—
Median latency
30 ms
—
p95 latency
43 ms
—
Evaluation suite
s1-decision-bench
—
Latest version
0.1.4
2026.09
Figures are from each model’s manifest; accuracy and latency are what the publishers report, on their own suites and hardware. Add a third model.
Questions
What is the difference between mira and solar-decide?
mira is from SAGEA and solar-decide from Upstage. mira has open weights you can download and run; solar-decide is only available as a hosted API. Both answer choice, score, noul, classify and route questions. mira is licensed apache-2.0; solar-decide, proprietary.
Which is more accurate, mira or solar-decide?
Only mira publishes an accuracy figure (74.5% on s1-decision-bench); solar-decide does not, so there is no comparison to make without your own test.
Which is cheaper, mira or solar-decide?
mira: Free (open weights). solar-decide: $0.1 / $0 per 1M. Open weights cost nothing per call beyond your own hardware.
Can I run mira or solar-decide locally?
mira yes — systemone pull sagea/mira downloads its weights. The other is only served as a hosted API.