An embedding model turned decision model. Qwen3-Embedding-4B with a merged LoRA, driven by the open JevEmbed toolkit, which scores Choice, Score and Noul questions from embedding similarity and returns a distribution without generating text.
A local, Jev-compatible decision model from Rizzo AI Academy. XHToken's Spark-X2.5-4B with a merged typed-decisions LoRA, run on llama.cpp; yes/no, choice and score questions share one prefill of the state and are read from the answer-letter logits. No text is generated.
Decides
choice, score, noul, classify
choice, score, noul, classify, route
Architecture
jevembed
rizzo-flow
Fine-tuned from
qwen/qwen3-embedding-4b
xhtoken/spark-x2.5-4b
License
apache-2.0
apache-2.0
Availability
Open weights
Open weights
Hosted by
—
—
Input price
—
—
Decision accuracy
85.9%
64.8%
Calibration error
—
0.112
Valid action rate
—
—
Median latency
—
195 ms
p95 latency
—
—
Figures are from each model’s manifest; accuracy and latency are what the publishers report, on their own suites and hardware. Add a third model.
Questions
What is the difference between jevembed and rizzo-flow?
jevembed is from HIT-TMG (Lychee Team) and rizzo-flow from Rizzo AI Academy. Both have open weights you can download and run. Both answer choice, score, noul and classify questions. Only rizzo-flow answers route.
Which is more accurate, jevembed or rizzo-flow?
They report on different suites — jevembed 85.9% on JevEmbed-Data test split (64,110 hard-label questions), final LoRA checkpoint before merging, rizzo-flow 64.8% on LocalLLaMA/typed-decisions test split (400 cases, 2,000 decisions), Q8_0 — so the numbers do not rank them. Test both on your own labelled examples.
Which is cheaper, jevembed or rizzo-flow?
jevembed: Free (open weights). rizzo-flow: Free (open weights). Open weights cost nothing per call beyond your own hardware.
Can I run jevembed or rizzo-flow locally?
Yes, both: systemone pull hit-tmg/jevembed and systemone pull rizzo-ai-academy/rizzo-flow download the weights.
Evaluation suite
JevEmbed-Data test split (64,110 hard-label questions), final LoRA checkpoint before merging
LocalLLaMA/typed-decisions test split (400 cases, 2,000 decisions), Q8_0