A multimodal decision classifier over text, image, audio and video on Gemma 4 12B, fine-tuned on 30,000 questions. Returns a probability per option and generates nothing.
An open System One model from Interfaze AI. A rank-32 LoRA on Qwen3.5-4B reads yes/no, choice and score answers from the logits of one forward pass, returns calibrated probabilities and serves the /v1/systemone API.
Decides
choice, noul, score, classify
choice, score, noul, classify, route
Architecture
jev-omni
lev
Fine-tuned from
google/gemma-4-12b-it
qwen/qwen3.5-4b
License
apache-2.0
apache-2.0
Availability
Open weights
Open weights
Hosted by
—
—
Input price
—
—
Decision accuracy
87.6%
68.9%
Calibration error
0.040
0.115
Valid action rate
—
—
Median latency
83 ms
69 ms
p95 latency
—
—
Evaluation suite
DecisionBench Medium (author's set)
S1Bench (13 public subsets, macro)
Figures are from each model’s manifest; accuracy and latency are what the publishers report, on their own suites and hardware. Add a third model.
Questions
What is the difference between jev-omni and lev?
jev-omni is from akhilaaa3 and lev from Interfaze AI. Both have open weights you can download and run. Both answer choice, noul, score and classify questions. Only lev answers route. lev is the smaller model, at 4.0B parameters to 12B.
Which is more accurate, jev-omni or lev?
They report on different suites — jev-omni 87.6% on DecisionBench Medium (author's set), lev 68.9% on S1Bench (13 public subsets, macro) — so the numbers do not rank them. Test both on your own labelled examples.
Which is cheaper, jev-omni or lev?
jev-omni: Free (open weights). lev: Free (open weights). Open weights cost nothing per call beyond your own hardware.
Which is faster, jev-omni or lev?
By their publishers’ figures, lev answers in about 69 ms at the median and jev-omni in about 83 ms — measured on different hardware, so treat it as a rough guide.
Can I run jev-omni or lev locally?
Yes, both: systemone pull akhilaaa3/jev-omni and systemone pull interfaze-ai/lev download the weights.