A typed-decision layer for Google's DiffusionGemma, from David Villalón at Maisa AI. It compiles a request into a small answer canvas, runs one denoising read on patched vLLM and reads the probabilities of the allowed labels, for text, images and images offered as options.
Small open typed-decision model with calibrated probabilities, first-class Nepali coverage.
Decides
choice, score, noul
choice, score, noul, classify, route
Architecture
djev
mira
Fine-tuned from
google/diffusiongemma-26b-a4b-it
jhu-clsp/mmbert-small
License
apache-2.0
apache-2.0
Availability
Open weights + hosted API
Open weights
Hosted by
Maisa
—
Input price
$0.035/MTok
—
Decision accuracy
—
74.5%
Calibration error
—
0.025
Valid action rate
—
100.0%
Median latency
—
30 ms
p95 latency
—
43 ms
Evaluation suite
—
s1-decision-bench
Latest version
2026.09
0.1.4
Figures are from each model’s manifest; accuracy and latency are what the publishers report, on their own suites and hardware. Add a third model.
Questions
What is the difference between djev and mira?
djev is from Maisa and mira from SAGEA. djev has open weights and a hosted API; mira has open weights you can download and run. Both answer choice, score and noul questions. Only mira answers classify and route.
Which is more accurate, djev or mira?
Only mira publishes an accuracy figure (74.5% on s1-decision-bench); djev does not, so there is no comparison to make without your own test.
Which is cheaper, djev or mira?
djev: $0.035 / $0 per 1M, or free to self-host. mira: Free (open weights). Open weights cost nothing per call beyond your own hardware.
Can I run djev or mira locally?
Yes, both: systemone pull maisa/djev and systemone pull sagea/mira download the weights.