The most-downloaded open System One reproduction. Merged Qwen3.5 fine-tunes, trained on about 95 public decision sets, then calibration-aware RL and a rank-64 LoRA, that softmax letter logits at an answer slot.
An open System One model from Interfaze AI. A rank-32 LoRA on Qwen3.5-4B reads yes/no, choice and score answers from the logits of one forward pass, returns calibrated probabilities and serves the /v1/systemone API.
Decides
choice, score, noul, classify, route
choice, score, noul, classify, route
Architecture
decider
lev
Fine-tuned from
qwen/qwen3.5-2b-base
qwen/qwen3.5-4b
License
apache-2.0
apache-2.0
Availability
Open weights
Open weights
Hosted by
—
—
Input price
—
—
Decision accuracy
80.2%
68.9%
Calibration error
0.038
0.115
Valid action rate
—
—
Median latency
3.2 ms
69 ms
p95 latency
—
—
Evaluation suite
Decider 67-task regression set
S1Bench (13 public subsets, macro)
Figures are from each model’s manifest; accuracy and latency are what the publishers report, on their own suites and hardware. Add a third model.
Questions
What is the difference between decider and lev?
decider is from Mapika and lev from Interfaze AI. Both have open weights you can download and run. Both answer choice, score, noul, classify and route questions. decider is the smaller model, at 2.0B parameters to 4.0B.
Which is more accurate, decider or lev?
They report on different suites — decider 80.2% on Decider 67-task regression set, lev 68.9% on S1Bench (13 public subsets, macro) — so the numbers do not rank them. Test both on your own labelled examples.
Which is cheaper, decider or lev?
decider: Free (open weights). lev: Free (open weights). Open weights cost nothing per call beyond your own hardware.
Which is faster, decider or lev?
By their publishers’ figures, decider answers in about 3.2 ms at the median and lev in about 69 ms — measured on different hardware, so treat it as a rough guide.
Can I run decider or lev locally?
Yes, both: systemone pull mapika/decider and systemone pull interfaze-ai/lev download the weights.