Liquid AI's first decision model, served only through the Liquid API. Returns Choice, Score and Noul answers with probability distributions and zero output tokens, on the /v1/systemone request shape used by TypeSafe's SDK.
A 144M-parameter System One model on the multilingual mmBERT-small encoder. Takes a state, a question and 2 to 20 options and returns one decision with probabilities for choice, score and yes/no questions, on a CPU.
Decides
choice, score, noul, classify, route
choice, score, noul, classify, route
Architecture
d1
julia
Fine-tuned from
—
jhu-clsp/mmbert-small
License
proprietary
apache-2.0
Availability
Hosted API
Open weights
Hosted by
Liquid AI
—
Input price
—
—
Decision accuracy
—
73.2%
Calibration error
—
—
Valid action rate
—
—
Median latency
—
—
p95 latency
—
—
Figures are from each model’s manifest; accuracy and latency are what the publishers report, on their own suites and hardware. Add a third model.
Questions
What is the difference between d1 and julia-1?
d1 is from Liquid AI and julia-1 from Supersonic Labs. d1 is only available as a hosted API; julia-1 has open weights you can download and run. Both answer choice, score, noul, classify and route questions. d1 is licensed proprietary; julia-1, apache-2.0.
Which is more accurate, d1 or julia-1?
Only julia-1 publishes an accuracy figure (73.2% on typed-decisions test set (400 cases, 2,000 questions)); d1 does not, so there is no comparison to make without your own test.
Which is cheaper, d1 or julia-1?
d1: Hosted, price not published. julia-1: Free (open weights). Open weights cost nothing per call beyond your own hardware.
Can I run d1 or julia-1 locally?
julia-1 yes — systemone pull supersonic-labs/julia-1 downloads its weights. The other is only served as a hosted API.
Evaluation suite
—
typed-decisions test set (400 cases, 2,000 questions)
